This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site you agree to our use of cookies. To find out more, see our Privacy and Cookies policy.
Skip to the content

[IOP] A community website from IOP Publishing

environmentalresearchweb blog

Reaching ‘peak bashing’ of peak oil

by Carey W King

The discussion of the death of peak oil has ramped up along with the increased hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling into tight sands and formations across North Dakota and Texas.  In fact, even people that think peak oil will correlate to significant problems for society shy away from the term.  But just as it is becoming more difficult to define what “oil” is in energy databases (it is now popular to report “liquids” that have vastly different life cycles and energy densities), the definition of “peak oil” seems to be in the context of the penholder (or typist).  Since I’m writing this blog, I of course get to define it for myself here, in what is a simple manner:

Peak oil is the concept that someday the rate of oil production for a country, region, or the world will reach a value that will never be exceeded

There is no need to pretend that a peak in oil production will occur due to decreasing demand or decreasing supply (or production).  However, it seems as though many articles have come out recently describing how peak oil theory is wrong because it is not the supply of oil that is peaking, but the demand for oil is peaking.  See these articles that give you the basic “peak demand” point of view:

The Economist (August 3, 2013): The world’s thirst for oil could be nearing a peak. That is bad news for producers, excellent for everyone else

EnergyWire (March 22, 2013): Has ‘peak oil’ gone the way of the Flat Earth Society?

Motley Fool (February 16, 2012): The End of the Peak Oil Theory

Note in my definition I don’t describe a shape to the curve describing production rate over time.  Many pundits claim that because oil production rate over time does not closely resemble a normal distribution (or bell curve), then peak oil theory is wrong.  That is ridiculous.  There is nothing inherent in the peak oil production concept that says there has to be a defined production rate over time.

Another “straw man” argument against “peak oil theory” is that adherents to the concept forecast calamity once oil production begins to irreversibly drop.   I’d say some people that focus on peak oil do believe there will be social chaos after it sets in.  There are an equal number of scholars, and likely more, that are just as knowledgeable but believe there will be declines in what most of us interpret as good living standards, but not necessarily social chaos.  The safest assumption is that we don’t know.   The global economy has grown along with oil production, and it will be forced to change with less oil production.

One of my favorite “peak oil” arguments for people avoiding the concept of finite resources is that we keep finding more oil (and oil-like substances) to extract. True.  But this still does not avoid the mathematical certainty that oil production on Earth will peak someday.  Just as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing enable us to produce the marginal barrel of oil at near 80 – 100 $/BBL, the fact that we have cars that get over 40 miles to the gallon also enables us to afford oil that costs 80 – 100 $/BBL.  If we never improved car fuel efficiency, we couldn’t afford as much oil as we consumed today.  If you want to afford more expensive oil, make your economy more oil-efficient.  At the moment, oil at $100/BBL is just about the level that keeps the developed world just above the brink of economic recession, but won’t let it get much further.

After denying that the world is a finite sphere (roughly), many commentators portend that the peak in oil production will be because of successes in the economy (new technology, increased efficiency, etc.) rather than failures or naturally-imposed limits.  The truth is that the debate will continue as long as oil is extracted.  The most likely scenario is that no one will ever be able to statistically determine if the peak in oil production occurs because we couldn’t produce enough versus we didn’t want to (or couldn’t afford to) consume enough.  People consume what they can afford and adjust for what they think they will be able to afford in the future.

Will a peak in the oil production rate mean that the global economy has successfully found substitutes or unsuccessfully tried to consume more?

This question is a setup because, again, we won’t be able to tell the difference.  All human choices (driving less, hybrid electric cars, biofuels, etc.) that end up causing “peak oil demand” are all responses to the overall inability to produce an infinite rate of anything in a finite space over a finite time.   If more oil could be produced at cheaper prices, people would be less incentivised for efficiency.  If oil must be produced at > $80/BBL, then consumers will, perhaps too slowly, adjust their total expenditures accordingly.

Stating that peak oil theory is dead while claiming we have reached “peak oil demand” is like pretending your body doesn’t cast a shadow.   You can’t have one without the other (wait … what about if the sun is directly overhead exactly halfway through the day?)

About Carey King

Dr. Carey W King performs interdisciplinary research related to how energy systems interact within the economy and environment as well as how our policy and social systems can make decisions and tradeoffs among these often competing factors. The past performance of our energy systems is no guarantee of future returns, yet we must understand the development of past energy systems. Carey’s research goals center on rigorous interpretations of the past to determine the most probable future energy pathways. Carey is a Research Scientist and Assistant Director at the Energy Institute at The University of Texas at Austin, and appointed also at the the Center for International Energy and Environmental Policy within the Jackson School of Geosciences and Business, Government, and Society Department of the McCombs School of Business. Visit his website at: http://careyking.com and follow on Twitter @CareyWKing
This entry was posted in Energy the nexus of everything and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.
View all posts by this author 

3 comments

  1. monk

    Also, oil demand isn’t peaking globally.

  2. Niles Ridgeman

    Nicely done. Well said, and necessarily said. Bang on.

  3. With all of the articles appearing these days about the passing of Peak Oil and how fracking and tar sands are going to save the day, I have the following to say:

    Peak Oil is still with us and beginning in the year 2015 the world will not be able to produce enough oil to meet the world’s growing needs – period. This finally convince people that Peak Oil is still for real.

    The real challenge is to produce enough oil the is affordable. $100 oil doesn’t solve the problem.

    Send for a copy of a Titan spreadsheet oil calculator that allows for the entering of 12 variable factors about oil and you will see for yourself that Peak Oil is still with us and will continue to be a serious world problem..

    C. Paul Davis
    pdavis@titanoilrecovery.com

Leave a comment

Your e-mail address will not be published.

Guidelines

  • Comments should be relevant to the article and not be used to promote your own work, products or services.
  • Please keep your comments brief (we recommend a maximum of 250 words).
  • We reserve the right to remove excessively long, inappropriate or offensive entries.

Show/hide formatting guidelines

Tag Description Example Output
<a> Hyperlink <a href="http://www.google.com">google</a> google
<abbr> Abbreviation <abbr title="World Health Organisation" >WHO</abbr> WHO
<acronym> Acronym <acronym title="as soon as possible">ASAP</acronym> ASAP
<b> Bold <b>Some text</b> Some text
<blockquote> Quoted from another source <blockquote cite="http://iop.org/">IOP</blockquote>
IOP
<cite> Cite <cite>Diagram 1</cite> Diagram 1
<del> Deleted text From this line<del datetime="2012-12-17"> this text was deleted</del> From this line this text was deleted
<em> Emphasized text In this line<em> this text was emphasised</em> In this line this text was emphasised
<i> Italic <i>Some text</i> Some text
<q> Quotation WWF goal is to build a future <q cite="http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/index.html">
where people live in harmony with nature and animals</q>
WWF goal is to build a future
where people live in harmony with nature and animals
<strike> Strike text <strike>Some text</strike> Some text
<strong> Stronger emphasis of text <strong>Some text</strong> Some text